ASSIGNMENT

Source Reasoning Lab 1: Treaty, Sovereignty, and Translation

Purpose
Practice close reading of a treaty as a negotiated, translated, and contested political instrument.

Fall 2026 deadline: Friday, September 25, 2026, 11:59 pm Central

Automatic grace period: through Sunday, September 27, 2026, 11:59 pm Central; no permission is needed and no penalty applies. Work is not accepted after the grace period without pre-approval or extenuating circumstances.

Task

Complete the source annotation in class, then write a 450–600 word memo that treats the treaty as a negotiated, translated, and contested political instrument. Finish an unseen transfer question and the common Decision Record.

Submission

Text entry or file upload.

Criteria for success

  1. In-class source annotation (8)
  2. Evidence-based reasoning memo (10)
  3. Unseen transfer question (5)
  4. Complete Decision Record (2)

AI boundary

No AI during annotation or transfer. Afterward, clarity feedback is allowed; generated treaty analysis or translation is not.

Decision Record

  1. State your initial claim or plan before substantial AI assistance.
  2. Name the most consequential interpretive choice you made and explain why.
  3. Identify one plausible alternative you rejected and the evidence behind that decision.
  4. Name evidence that changed, narrowed, or complicated your thinking.
  5. State one claim you cannot fully establish with the available evidence.
  6. Record AI use: tool, purpose, what you accepted, rejected, and verified—or write ‘No generative AI used.’

Process checklist

Evaluation

This assignment is evaluated on four levels—Exemplary, Proficient, Developing, and Beginning—across the listed criteria. Ask for clarification before submitting if the purpose, task, or criteria are unclear.